This is a non-independent marketing communication commissioned by Invesco. The report has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on the dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.

investment trustsStephen Anness, manager of Invesco Perpetual Select Trust plc’s Global Equity Income share portfolio, considers the outlook for global equities after a roller-coaster year like no other…




Global equity markets recovered strongly in Q2 and have remained well supported through July. Following the most rapid declines in equity markets in Q1 we saw one of the fastest recoveries in Q2. Co-ordinated monetary and fiscal policy of unprecedented scale was unleashed to help alleviate the economic, market and societal cost of the lockdown response to the Covid-19 pandemic. Most asset classes delivered positive returns for the second quarter with the tech heavy NASDAQ index leading equity index returns.

Investment outlook


What are the key market dynamics we observe today?


Firstly, technology. In the near term the pandemic has acted as an accelerant to many of the trends which were already in motion; online shopping, increased usage of digital technologies, more flexible working and use of cloud-based IT infrastructure.

Given the devastating impact of lockdown on many industries, it is rational that the market has latched on to an industry where the outlook is improving in this backdrop. Indeed, the portfolio is overweight (versus its weighting in the MSCI World reference index) the technology sector due principally to our positions in semiconductors, although we also have holdings in some large well-known software and e commerce companies.

Despite this overweight position, one of our key performance detractors this year has been our lack of exposure to technology stocks in emerging niches or with cutting edge, conceptual business models.

Typically, they exhibit the fastest forecast revenue growth, but with little earnings and even scarcer dividends. Our holdings in this sector, such as semiconductors, are more mature business models in consolidated markets and usually generate substantial free cashflow and thus the ability to pay sustainable and growing dividends.

However, whilst the performance of these holdings has been good in absolute terms, they have not matched their more racy ‘emerging growth’ counterparts.

The sharp rise in the share price performance (and now valuations) of the 75 fastest growing companies in the technology sector provide some eerie similarities to prior periods which, with hindsight, showed that reality did not quite match the hype.

From looking back at 1999/2000 we know that only a fraction of the most highly valued companies during that period went on to be attractive investments in subsequent years.

Market enthusiasm for well-founded stories is nothing new; but neither is the ability of the market to push expectations and thus share prices, too far. The 1999/2000 technology boom is an obvious analogy but there are many others.

Below is a chart from the 1800’s showing the index of British railway companies as rail began to be built out – the reality did not live up to the growth expectations.


It is our view that much of the excitement around ‘tech’ is valid; many are excellent, cash generative and growing businesses. But in some instances, we believe the market has taken these qualities to an extreme level in terms of valuations.

In part this reflects the current unusual interest rate environment. As we write the US 10-year government bond yield has fallen close to an all-time low. Such a low yield has implications for investors when they value future cash flows such that the value of growth in the future is much higher. This has been a key driver to the share price performance of companies for whom positive cash flows and dividends remain many years in the future.

Can we rely on bond yields to remain at these levels to support this thesis?


The answer to that question strikes us as critical; we have all become used to low and falling bond yields, the market narrative and valuation structure seemingly suggests lower forever, not just lower for longer.

We believe it is worth considering that things may well be changing – driven by the response to the pandemic, which has been unprecedented; trillions of dollars of fiscal and monetary policy have either already been enacted or is soon to be introduced.

Should economic conditions not improve, we believe it is inevitable that we will see further stimulatory measures. The reason we have highlighted this as a key market dynamic is that we believe there will be consequences that stem from this.

Without this response we risked turning a health crisis into a banking crisis. However, herein lies the issue.

Whilst the policy response is akin to what happened following the 2008/09 global financial crisis, the underlying causes and challenges are different this time around. We frequently hear that QE (quantitative easing) post-2008 was not inflationary – we disagree. It is an inflationary policy; it just didn’t create inflation because broad money growth in the economy fell as the banking crisis unfolded.

2008/9 was caused by a banking crisis, bank lending contracted, and QE was enacted to offset the impact of this contraction. The current situation is quite different.

We are not ‘top-down’ investors but nonetheless it is important to recognise the forces at play in the market. Several companies which have performed well this year are excellent businesses, with many benefiting from the current conditions of working from home and an acceleration toward a digital economy.

However, we must consider that interest rates and policy are impacting valuations. Any change to the perception that rates are ‘lower for longer’ and that yields could increase from current levels could change equity market leadership markedly in our view.



We see a number of ‘risks’ on the horizon, not all of which are downside risks.

There are clear negative risks around the virus, the economic consequences of lockdown and unemployment. Jobless numbers have risen sharply, consumer habits may well have changed permanently and asset classes such as commercial real estate face an uncertain future.

However, there are of course upside risks; we may discover a new treatment or vaccine, herd immunity may be reached faster than predicted or indeed the virus may ‘burn out’ in the population as previous viruses have done. Coupled with the quantity of stimulus now being injected into the global economy there could be a powerful recovery.

We are not offering odds on any of those outcomes, merely that we must acknowledge that the risks around virus control and economies are not all skewed to the downside – which makes portfolio construction more challenging than ever.

We believe it is right to have a portion of the portfolio allocated to companies which could do well once virus fears begin to dissipate. We appreciate this may take time but there are excellent businesses in travel & leisure, financial services and retail which could emerge from this crisis stronger as weaker competitors stumble.

We believe the market is over-looking the prospects for many of these companies; we would highlight JP Morgan, Amadeus and Zurich as excellent businesses within their respective industries.

We appreciate that our holdings in select companies such as these are quite different to market consensus but believe the long-term asymmetry of returns to be very much in our favour at this juncture.


investment trusts

Past performance is not a guide to future returns
Ordinary share price performance figures have been calculated using daily closing prices with dividends reinvested. NAV performance figures have been calculated using daily NAV with dividends reinvested. The NAV used includes current period revenue and values debt at fair. The MSCI World Index (£) Total Return performance shown is total return (net of withholding tax). All performance figures are in sterling as at 30 June 2020 except where otherwise stated. Standardised past performance figures are updated on a quarterly basis


Investment risks

The value of investments and any income will fluctuate (this may partly be the result of exchange-rate fluctuations) and investors may not get back the full amount invested.

When making an investment in an investment trust you are buying shares in a company that is listed on a stock exchange. The price of the shares will be determined by supply and demand. Consequently, the share price of an investment trust may be higher or lower than the underlying net asset value of the investments in its portfolio and there can be no certainty that there will be liquidity in the shares.

The product uses derivatives for efficient portfolio management which may result in increased volatility in the NAV. The use of borrowings may increase the volatility of the NAV and may reduce returns when asset values fall.

The product invests in emerging and developing markets, where difficulties in relation to market liquidity, dealing, settlement and custody problems could arise.

As a result of COVID-19, markets have seen a noticeable increase in volatility as well as, in some cases, lower liquidity levels; this may continue and may increase these risks in the future. In addition, some companies are suspending, lowering or postponing their dividend payments, which may affect the income received by the Invesco Perpetual Select Trust plc Global Equity Income Share Portfolio during this period and in the future.

The Directors intend that each portfolio will effectively operate as if it were a stand-alone company. However, prospective investors should be aware that in the event that any of the portfolios have insufficient funds or assets to meet all of its liabilities, such a shortfall would become a liability of the other portfolios. In addition, should the investment trust incur material liabilities in the future, a significant fall in the value of the investment’s trust assets as a whole may affect the investment trust’s ability to pay dividends on a particular class of share portfolio, even though these are distributable profits attributable to the relevant portfolio.

Important information

Where Stephen Anness has expressed opinions, they are based on current market conditions, may differ from those of other investment professionals and are subject to change without notice.

This document is marketing material and is not intended as a recommendation to invest in any particular asset class, security or strategy. Regulatory requirements that require impartiality of investment/investment strategy recommendations are therefore not applicable nor are any prohibitions to trade before publication. The information provided is for illustrative purposes only, it should not be relied upon as recommendations to buy or sell securities.

For more information on our products, please refer to the relevant Key Information Document (KID), Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive document (AIFMD), and the latest Annual or Half-Yearly Financial Reports. This information is available from

Issued by Invesco Fund Managers Limited Perpetual Park, Perpetual Park Drive, Henley-on-Thames, Oxfordshire RG9 1HH, UK Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.



This report has been issued by Kepler Partners LLP.  The analyst who has prepared this report is aware that Kepler Partners LLP has a relationship with the company covered in this report and/or a conflict of interest which may impair the objectivity of the research.

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. The value of investments can fall as well as rise and you may get back less than you invested when you decide to sell your investments. It is strongly recommended that if you are a private investor independent financial advice should be taken before making any investment or financial decision.

Kepler Partners is not authorised to make recommendations to retail clients. This report has been issued by Kepler Partners LLP, is based on factual information only, is solely for information purposes only and any views contained in it must not be construed as investment or tax advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or take any action in relation to any investment.

The information provided on this website is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation or which would subject Kepler Partners LLP to any registration requirement within such jurisdiction or country. In particular, this website is exclusively for non-US Persons. Persons who access this information are required to inform themselves and to comply with any such restrictions.

The information contained in this website is not intended to constitute, and should not be construed as, investment advice. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is given by any person as to the accuracy or completeness of the information and no responsibility or liability is accepted for the accuracy or sufficiency of any of the information, for any errors, omissions or misstatements, negligent or otherwise. Any views and opinions, whilst given in good faith, are subject to change without notice.

This is not an official confirmation of terms and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell or take any action in relation to any investment mentioned herein. Any prices or quotations contained herein are indicative only.  

Kepler Partners LLP (including its partners, employees and representatives) or a connected person may have positions in or options on the securities detailed in this report, and may buy, sell or offer to purchase or sell such securities from time to time, but will at all times be subject to restrictions imposed by the firm’s internal rules. A copy of the firm’s Conflict of Interest policy is available on request.

Leave a Reply