From Silicon Valley to Switzerland, banking stress has tested policymakers and unnerved markets, stirring memories of the global financial crisis. But are these isolated incidents or a symptom of deeper problems? Our global Chief Investment Officers (CIOs) offer their take – and indicate what investors should consider next.

 

 

Key takeaways

 

  • Recent events are the latest reminder of financial fallouts that might occur because of the shift to a higher interest rate regime.
  • Policymakers, already grappling with managing high inflation, may now also focus on tightening regulation to contain financial risks.
  • Volatility is set to persist, particularly in equity markets as investors scrutinise the resilience of banking and technology companies.
  • Focus on quality: favourable opportunities are likely to emerge for stock pickers in quality value and growth names.

 

Equity view

 

Navigating higher capital costs

“Money has a cost again” – we are seeing the pressures created by higher interest rates come into sharp focus again in recent days. Over the past year, we have experienced not just the fastest increase but also the largest tightening of policy rates since 19801 – rates are up 450 basis points since March 2022.

Money supply, as measured by M2, is growing more slowly than nominal Gross Domestic Product (GDP), meaning less money for financial assets. Until recently, the world was awash with liquidity – a situation accentuated by the Covid-19 pandemic where governments provided additional support for economies. This has helped stoke inflationary pressures, including wage pressure. In developed economies like the US, wages can represent up to 70% of costs.

The tightening of monetary conditions can lead to potential flash points, as we have seen with Silicon Valley Bank (SVB). While not a systemically important bank, SVB grew very rapidly and was a victim of concentration risk, with its focus on the technology industry, combined with some unwise risk management.

Like water, higher capital costs are permeating the system and finding the “lowest” or the weakest points in the system. When this occurs at a time of slower economic growth, it can highlight the weaker segments and trigger intense reactions.

When risk is distributed across many banks or players under a strong supervision framework, the system can handle it. The current robustness of the financial system is supported by the tighter regulation we have seen since the global financial crisis, especially in Europe. We believe it is highly likely that the latest events could lead to a tightening of regulations in the US.

 

What to consider now

 

Market events continue to support our focus on quality. We favour a carefully constructed portfolio of high-conviction positions. We consider anchoring portfolios around low-volatility multi-factor strategies that provide a possible bedrock of stability on which to build. Second, we believe the current environment has created potentially favourable opportunities for stock pickers in quality value and growth names, as well as income. Finally, we retain high conviction around long-term thematics.

All things considered, we think that rising rates should be positive for the financial sector, as they support margins, and buying opportunities may emerge in the coming months. But key considerations include the impact of latest events on confidence and the cost of deposits, and the impact of higher rates on final demand and hence on earnings power. Overall, we believe investors can take some comfort from the fact that the financial system appears to be overall stronger than it was previously. In our view, it needs to be, as with “money having a cost again”, it will likely be tested further.

1 Source: Refinitv Datastream as of December 1, 2022. Past performance does not predict future returns.

 

Multi-asset view

 

Seeking safe havens from market unease

 

In many ways, the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) was an idiosyncratic event, caused by some poor risk management choices. But we might classify it as one of a series of recent “accidents” that can at least in part be attributed to the sharp rise in interest rates. Investors will want to know where the stresses caused by this abrupt regime change might surface next.

It’s reassuring to the market that Credit Suisse has secured financing that provides an immediate lifeline. Breaking it apart would be complex. The banking sector is, by nature, built on the trust of depositors and counterparties, and we may see strong intervention from regulators and central banks to support confidence in the sector.

Indeed, the US Federal Reserve (Fed) and the European Central Bank (ECB) will be on high alert and we think recent events could be the trigger for markets to move to what we qualify as a “risk off, liquidity off” scenario associated with financial accident. Overall, this environment is not a constructive one for risky assets (to say the least) and safe havens like the US dollar and US Treasuries should benefit.

Central banks face a dilemma: do they pivot from their medium-term goal of fighting inflation to a more short-term priority of preventing a bank run or contagion? We already had an answer from the ECB, which chose to stick with its expected 0.5 percentage-point rise in rates at its meeting on 16 March, but crucially the central bank removed reference to future rate rises.

 

What to consider now

 

By addressing the SVB incident quickly, the Fed may also have bought itself time to continue to focus on its core target – to bring core inflation under control by raising leading rates. This could trigger further weakness in the economy and a softening of core inflationary pressures, which is the goal of the Fed, especially considering the recent strong labour market data.

We could be due a weaker phase in US equities, especially as valuations remain on the high side and margins deteriorate. We recently reduced US equities in multi-asset portfolios, while shifting to a more positive stance on US Treasuries, at least tactically. We are a bit more constructive in some areas, like emerging markets that offer attractive valuations and are supported by the reopening of China. Similarly, the Japanese yen, with now-positive yields, also offers strong safe-haven potential. With little visibility about the coming period, caution should be the watchword.

 

Fixed Income View

 

Seeing opportunities for active positioning on the yield curve

It all started in Silicon Valley with a relatively unknown bank facing record outflows of more than USD 40 billion in just one day. Within a week, the European banking sector lost more than 10% of its market value. Credit default swaps (CDSs) widened by around 40bps on senior unsecured debt and 70bps on subordinated, respectively. This contagion makes no sense for banking analysts: we stand by our conviction that European banks are not in crisis.

Even so, we must adjust to this new reality, especially as the banking sector is based on confidence. We are selecting the most resilient names thanks to our bottom-up investment process based on thorough analysis of fundamentals.

Generally, liquidity is not a problem for large US and European banks, which are mostly compliant with regulatory liquidity minimums by a wide margin. And we are confident central banks would act vigorously to prevent a systemic liquidity crisis if needed.

Recent events have caused a major adjustment of yield curves in the US and euro zone, with a drastic revision of central banks’ rate-hike expectations. In February, investors seemed to capitulate by lifting expectations by more than 100 basis points (bps) for the Fed terminal rate and 80bps for the ECB terminal rate between the beginning and end of the month. The banking stress has reduced expectations for interest rate rises to almost zero for the Fed and considerably reduced the ECB’s terminal rate outlook. This downward correction on rates was concentrated on the short and intermediate part of the curves, but also affected long-term rates.

In our view, these revisions seem excessive. As indicated by the ECB, central banks have specific tools to deal with a potential liquidity crisis. The strength of core inflation should not make them relax their efforts to fight inflation. We still expect central banks to raise rates. But the extent of the hikes will be determined by their success in containing the stress on the banking sector and by the path of core inflation.

 

What to consider now

 

We think this very high volatility in the bond markets could create opportunities for active positioning on the yield curve by underweighting the short end, which we think should correct upwards. We consider taking advantage of the recent tensions in credit spreads to overweight allocations, particularly in banks whose spreads have widened by contagion and in an undetermined manner.

investing
 

 

Disclaimer
Diversification does not guarantee a profit or protect against losses.

Investing involves risk. The value of an investment and the income from it will fluctuate and investors may not get back the principal invested. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. This is a marketing communication. It is for informational purposes only. This document does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security and shall not be deemed an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security.

The views and opinions expressed herein, which are subject to change without notice, are those of the issuer or its affiliated companies at the time of publication. Certain data used are derived from various sources believed to be reliable, but the accuracy or completeness of the data is not guaranteed and no liability is assumed for any direct or consequential losses arising from their use. The duplication, publication, extraction or transmission of the contents, irrespective of the form, is not permitted.

This material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authorities. In mainland China, it is for Qualified Domestic Institutional Investors scheme pursuant to applicable rules and regulations and is for information purpose only. This document does not constitute a public offer by virtue of Act Number 26.831 of the Argentine Republic and General Resolution No. 622/2013 of the NSC. This communication’s sole purpose is to inform and does not under any circumstance constitute promotion or publicity of Allianz Global Investors products and/or services in Colombia or to Colombian residents pursuant to part 4 of Decree 2555 of 2010. This communication does not in any way aim to directly or indirectly initiate the purchase of a product or the provision of a service offered by Allianz Global Investors. Via reception of his document, each resident in Colombia acknowledges and accepts to have contacted Allianz Global Investors via their own initiative and that the communication under no circumstances does not arise from any promotional or marketing activities carried out by Allianz Global Investors. Colombian residents accept that accessing any type of social network page of Allianz Global Investors is done under their own responsibility and initiative and are aware that they may access specific information on the products and services of Allianz Global Investors. This communication is strictly private and confidential and may not be reproduced. This communication does not constitute a public offer of securities in Colombia pursuant to the public offer regulation set forth in Decree 2555 of 2010. This communication and the information provided herein should not be considered a solicitation or an offer by Allianz Global Investors or its affiliates to provide any financial products in Brazil, Panama, Peru, and Uruguay. In Australia, this material is presented by Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Limited (“AllianzGI AP”) and is intended for the use of investment consultants and other institutional/professional investors only, and is not directed to the public or individual retail investors. AllianzGI AP is not licensed to provide financial services to retail clients in Australia. AllianzGI AP is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian Foreign Financial Service License under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) pursuant to ASIC Class Order (CO 03/1103) with respect to the provision of financial services to wholesale clients only. AllianzGI AP is licensed and regulated by Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission under Hong Kong laws, which differ from Australian laws.

This document is being distributed by the following Allianz Global Investors companies: Allianz Global Investors GmbH, an investment company in Germany, authorized by the German Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin); Allianz Global Investors (Schweiz) AG; in HK, by Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Ltd., licensed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission; in Singapore, by Allianz Global Investors Singapore Ltd., regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore [Company Registration No. 199907169Z]; in Japan, by Allianz Global Investors Japan Co., Ltd., registered in Japan as a Financial Instruments Business Operator [Registered No. The Director of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Financial Instruments Business Operator), No. 424], Member of Japan Investment Advisers Association, the Investment Trust Association, Japan and Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association; in Taiwan, by Allianz Global Investors Taiwan Ltd., licensed by Financial Supervisory Commission in Taiwan; and in Indonesia, by PT. Allianz Global Investors Asset Management Indonesia licensed by Indonesia Financial Services Authority (OJK).





Leave a Reply