Wide discount could be an attractive entry point for long-term investors: BlackRock Income & Growth

 

BRIG is trading at a wide discount versus its five-year history which could be an attractive entry point for long-term investors…

 

Overview

 

Adam Avigdori and David Goldman have managed BlackRock Income & Growth Investment Trust (BRIG) since April 2012 and July 2017, respectively. Over this time, they have constructed a well-diversified, yet concentrated portfolio of around 40 stocks, reflecting their best ideas. Both managers are avid stock pickers driven by bottom-up fundamental research and remain steadfast in their investment process, refusing to change what they look for based on the latest market trend.

The managers will avoid deep value stocks, i.e. businesses that are cheap for a good reason, and unprofitable growth companies. Instead, they want to invest in businesses that they feel showcase strong balance sheets, sustainable free cash flows, discipline in capital allocation and an adherence to their ESG values, which is what delivers a higher quality bias (see Portfolio section). They view any potential and current investments under three categories, allocating roughly 70% of the portfolio to ‘income’ generators, featuring companies with sustainably high free cash flows and a growing dividend, 20% towards ‘growth’ companies and the remaining 10% to ‘turnaround’ opportunities.

BRIG has marginally outperformed the FTSE All-Share Index over the past five years, buoyed by its bias towards quality stocks, and more recently, some exposure to value stocks (see Performance section). However, there have been periods where performance has lagged, largely when style factors have solely driven the market, like the growth rally we experienced during the pandemic.

BRIG’s strong revenue reserves allowed it to maintain its dividends throughout the pandemic (see Dividend section). The trust trades on a discount of 13.7%, wider than average for the sector.

 

Analyst’s View

 

We believe BRIG offers a differentiated approach to growth and income investing. The managers avoid sector or style biases, allowing for flexibility in portfolio construction when market conditions change, and their focus on quality companies, coupled with a more cautious approach to gearing, provides a defensive element to the portfolio. The total return focus means that BRIG does not pay as high dividends as others in the sector, but we believe that its focus on dividend and capital growth should be attractive to long-term investors.

BRIG’s performance was strong at the beginning of Adam’s tenure, but amidst a volatile macro backdrop over the last five years it has struggled a bit. The investment process reflects a more balanced factor approach than most peers in the sector, meaning it’s not strongly tilted to either growth or value. Over the last five years, we’ve experienced some significant rotations in style, whereby market performance has been led by either growth or value stocks, which has meant the trust underperformed the sector. That said, having a more balanced approach than some peers has meant it has delivered better relative performance more recently (see Performance section) and over the long term. We would argue that it could be a good way to invest in troubled market environments where value and growth rotations are no longer driving performance, but quality is more important. BRIG’s discount is much wider than its historical average, so if performance continues, it could lead to the discount narrowing. This would provide investors with an extra kicker to returns and therefore could make it a compelling investment proposition for patient investors looking for exposure to the UK market.

 

Bull

• A higher dividend yield than the benchmark, coupled with growth prospects
• Wider than average discount could present an attractive long-term entry point for investors
• Portfolio’s quality and value investments have done well amidst the style rotation away from growth

 

Bear

• Higher level of gearing can magnify losses on the downside
• Small trust size limits institutional investors and liquidity
• Having a more balanced approach to style factors could mean it lags peers when either growth or value drives market performance

 

See the full research paper here >

 

 

 

_{This is a non-independent marketing communication commissioned by BlackRock. The report has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on the dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.}

Disclaimer

This report has been issued by Kepler Partners LLP.  The analyst who has prepared this report is aware that Kepler Partners LLP has a relationship with the company covered in this report and/or a conflict of interest which may impair the objectivity of the research.

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. The value of investments can fall as well as rise and you may get back less than you invested when you decide to sell your investments. It is strongly recommended that if you are a private investor independent financial advice should be taken before making any investment or financial decision.

Kepler Partners is not authorised to make recommendations to retail clients. This report has been issued by Kepler Partners LLP, is based on factual information only, is solely for information purposes only and any views contained in it must not be construed as investment or tax advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or take any action in relation to any investment.

The information provided on this website is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation or which would subject Kepler Partners LLP to any registration requirement within such jurisdiction or country. In particular, this website is exclusively for non-US Persons. Persons who access this information are required to inform themselves and to comply with any such restrictions.

The information contained in this website is not intended to constitute, and should not be construed as, investment advice. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is given by any person as to the accuracy or completeness of the information and no responsibility or liability is accepted for the accuracy or sufficiency of any of the information, for any errors, omissions or misstatements, negligent or otherwise. Any views and opinions, whilst given in good faith, are subject to change without notice.

This is not an official confirmation of terms and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell or take any action in relation to any investment mentioned herein. Any prices or quotations contained herein are indicative only.  

Kepler Partners LLP (including its partners, employees and representatives) or a connected person may have positions in or options on the securities detailed in this report, and may buy, sell or offer to purchase or sell such securities from time to time, but will at all times be subject to restrictions imposed by the firm’s internal rules. A copy of the firm’s Conflict of Interest policy is available on request.