• 41% of customers still haven’t noticed any changes to their treatment since Consumer Duty was introduced in July 2023
  • But 42% believe that Consumer Duty will have a positive impact on the quality and range of products and services available 
  • Data is key to identifying, mitigating and reporting on foreseeable harms and consumer outcomes

A year on from the introduction of the FCA’s Consumer Duty (CD) obligations for financial services firms, as many as two-fifths of customers have not noticed any changes to their treatment, according to research from engagement, data and customer journey platform Moneyhub. With the deadline fast approaching for financial services firms to apply the Consumer Duty to closed products, the research indicates that firms still have work to do to realise the business and consumer benefits of the Consumer Duty.

The research, which polled 2,000 UK consumers, found that only a fifth (22%) said they have already noticed improvements in how they are treated as customers since Consumer Duty regulations came into effect. However, when asked about improvements to customer outcomes, 13% said firms have failed to deliver good quality support and after-sales care, while 12% said firms have failed to deliver communications that help them to make effective financial decisions. 10% felt firms failed to offer suitable products and services that meet their needs.

Also laid bare by the research are the stark generational differences when it comes to noticing changes in financial services firms’ behaviours. As many as 40% of younger respondents thought they had noticed changes in how banks were interacting with them, compared to just 5% of over 55s.

Looking to the future, many customers remain hopeful that the Consumer Duty will have a significant impact on how firms interact with them. Over two-fifths (42%) believe that Consumer Duty will have a positive impact on the quality and range of products and services available – rising to 53% among younger respondents. 40% think that Consumer Duty will have a big impact on customer servicing – rising to 48% of younger respondents. Similarly, 36% think that Consumer Duty will drive banks to become more customer-centric institutions – more similar to building societies.

By 31st July 2024, FCA-regulated companies will have to review closed products and services against all aspects of the Duty. This in itself prompts a re-evaluation of products that current customers are on and whether they are still appropriate.

The FCA has said repeatedly that firms must put data at the heart of their response to the Consumer Duty. Indeed the FCA’s recent multi-firm review into insurance outcomes further evidenced the importance of firms using new sources of data to design comprehensive measures that evaluate consumer outcomes as well as process outcomes, to proactively demonstrate that vulnerable customers receive outcomes that are the same as non-vulnerable customers, and that the monitoring of outcomes leads to proactive improvements. It’s vital that firms detail their data gaps and develop plans to enhance the data or their approach to monitoring.
Dan Scholey, COO of Moneyhub comments: “Consumer Duty really should be a win for both businesses who want to work more efficiently and effectively as well as consumers who need more tailored solutions at affordable prices. The early feedback from firms that have embraced it is overwhelmingly positive. However with significant fines now being imposed by the FCA* we have both the stick and the carrot in place to see better outcomes delivered.

“Firms often don’t know where to start, but it is always with the data. The UK has made great strides through regulation to make the data available, and with it, firms can cost-effectively understand an individual’s needs and provide the right solutions at the right time. Embracing the use of third-party Open Data solutions is the best way for firms to meet Consumer Duty requirements while seeing a tangible impact on their customers’ day-to-day finances, and satisfaction levels.”

Leave a Reply